Water Cooler Games served as the web's primary forum for "videogames with an agenda" — coverage of the uses of video games in advertising, politics, education, and other everyday activities, outside the sphere of entertainment.
The site was maintained at watercoolergames.org from 2003-2009, where it was edited by myself and Gonzalo Frasca. It is now archived here in full.
I was talking to Nick the other day about a decade-old attempt to use neurofeedback in games. MindDrive was supposed to "harness the brain's impulses" to control simple movements in games. The device was developed by Ron Gordon, former Atari chief executive. He was actually attempting to create a kind of biofeedback remote control for just about anything. He never managed to get further than detecting lateral movement, which is maybe good enough for opening the fridge (maybe) but certainly not good enough to detect complex physical and emotional states. Anyway, that was back in the mid 1990s.
It seems that not much has changed since then. The other day, Kotaku pointed out this article on neurotech, including a mention of BioControl Systems, a company making "devices that allow people to control computerized equipment with their nerve impulses." Among the foundering company's clients,
Probably the most successful implementation of biofeedback in games is Journey to Wild Divine, a reallly impressive specimen that responds to physical feedback like heart rate and skin conductance. One of the reasons Wild Divine is successful, however, is that it's specific purpose is meditation and stress reduction. It's purpose is to make the player aware of his or her phsyical state, and to help the player understand and control that state.
Reading the absurdly Polyannaish Ability article on MindDrive and this recent device from the Mercury News, coupled with all the rumors and weird patents on brain-controlled PlayStations just makes it clear that we haven't even begun to scratch the surface of the representation of emotion in games. The just-released Façade is one example of a heavy-duty AI approach, but other possibilities exist too. I think the continued interest in neurotech says more about our lack of interest, commitment, or comfort with exploring human emotions as expressive systems instead of technical systems that can be mastered or controlled. Presently, I have no interest in the technofetishism of brain-connected devices. I'd much rather see videogames that explore emotions than try to respond to parameterized versions of my own.
Making Books
Academic Professional Job Opening
Slashdot Q&A
The Bulldog and the Pegasus
Speculative Realism Aggregator Update
Comments
NeMutluTürkümDiyene on Where in the World was Middle Earth?
Algogedaummam on Object-Oriented Ontology Symposium
Christopher Schaberg on Making Books
Jose Zagal on Making Books
Ian Bogost on Making Books
The Curse of Cow Clicker
Beyond the Elbow-Patched Playground
Low-Earth Lamentation
Shit Crayons
Aerotropolis
Against Aca-Fandom
There are no Blown Calls in Football
We Think in Public
What is Object-Oriented Ontology?
The Metaphysics Videogame
Cascading Failure
Top Ten Reasons I Returned My Kindle
Carrying On Over Carry-Ons
Reading Online Sucks







