Imagine a video game about the difficult life of a typical, but troubled adolescent. He’s the product of a broken home and alienated from his parents, who are more interested in the novelty of their new marriage than in the responsibility of raising a child. He’s been in and out of different schools and finds it hard to make friends. Disappointing relationships make it hard for him to trust other kids, and more so other adults. He acts out and gets in trouble, sometimes from boredom, sometimes from belligerence, and sometimes just to get some attention, since he doesn’t get any at home.
If you ask him, he’d probably tell you that most people are not to be trusted, that they’d rather push you around than give you the time of day. Rather than wait to be proven right, he might knock you down first if you have the wrong look about you. He sees himself as an outsider and despises cliques, although he really has a lot in common with a number of mainstream social groups. He’s had a few crushes but never had the chance to really pursue amorous relationships, partly because he never had a positive model for them at home, and partly because he tends to get in trouble before he can make a move. He has intellectual promise but rarely lives up to his potential, mostly because he doesn’t know how to channel his positive and negative energy into pro-social pursuits.
The video game would allow the player to live in the shoes of this typical adolescent during a time-compressed academic calendar year, in order to understand the conflicted social situation for a troubled teen. The game might be appropriate for teenagers, especially as a curative. But it would really be targeted at adults, especially the parents, educators, and policymakers who have the power, authority, and life experience to help counsel teens like him in the real world.
This description sounds like it might have been lifted from a grant proposal for a serious game, one that a researcher might submit to the Department of Education, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the National Science Foundation (NSF). But it’s not. It’s the premise for Rockstar Games' controversial new title, Bully.
Academic Professional Job Opening
Slashdot Q&A
The Bulldog and the Pegasus
Speculative Realism Aggregator Update
On Technical Agency and Procedural Rhetoric
Comments
Hipolito M. Wiseman on What is a Sports Videogame?
Gamification101 on Gamification is Bullshit
James on Help Feed the Speculative Realism Feed
Casey O'Donnell on On Technical Agency and Procedural Rhetoric
Michael- on Help Feed the Speculative Realism Feed
The Curse of Cow Clicker
Beyond the Elbow-Patched Playground
Low-Earth Lamentation
Shit Crayons
Aerotropolis
Against Aca-Fandom
There are no Blown Calls in Football
We Think in Public
What is Object-Oriented Ontology?
The Metaphysics Videogame
Cascading Failure
Top Ten Reasons I Returned My Kindle
Carrying On Over Carry-Ons
Reading Online Sucks







